Asthma and Loss of Smell

Persistent asthma has an accumulative impact on the loss of smell in patients with nasal polyposis

According to published reports in journals sponsored by the U.S. National Institute of Health, loss of sense of smell is one of the most frequent complaints in patients with nasal polyposis (NP). Studies were conducted to evaluate the impact of asthma and its severity on the sense of smell.

Abstract:

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

Patients with massive NP and healthy controls were included. More than half of patients presented with asthma. Ol factometry by Barcelona Smell Test 24, nasal symptoms score, nasal endoscopy, allergy study, and paranasal sinus CT scan were assessed.

RESULTS:

NP patients showed a significant impairment in smell detection, identification, and forced choice compared to the control. Asthmatics reported lower scores for detection, identification, and forced choice than non-asthmatic patients. Patients with persistent asthma had an increased impairment of sense of smell on detection, identification, and forced choice than patients with intermittent asthma. No significant differences were found between mild, moderate, and severe persistent asthmatics. Paranasal sinuses opacification was inversely correlated with smell detection, identification and forced choice.

CONCLUSION:

These findings suggest that patients with NP have an impaired sense of smell, that asthma -particularly persistent asthma- has a further impact on sense of smell, and that loss of smell may be used as a clinical tool to identify the severity of both NP and asthma.

Asthma and Pseudomonas Bacteria

Allergic Inflammation and Asthma Possibly linked to Pseudomonas Bacteria

Could some cases of asthma actually be caused by an allergic reaction to a common environmental bacteria? New research findings published in the Journal of Leukocyte Biology suggests that this is a possibility. In a research report appearing in the February 2012 print issue, researchers show a link between common environmental bacteria and airway inflammation. Specifically, their research suggests that some strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cause white blood cells to produce very high levels of histamine, which in turn leads to inflammation, a hallmark symptom of asthma.

In this five minute interview with Dr. George Caughey, M.D. Chief, Pulmonary/Critical Care/Sleep Medicine Section San Francisco VA Medical Center and Professor of Medicine at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) School of Medicine we discuss the key studies findings, potential treatment options and laboratory test for Pseudomonas Bacteria.

“We hope that these findings in mice will encourage human-focused research regarding bacterial stimulation of histamine production by white blood cells, like neutrophils, that are not traditionally associated with allergic inflammation,” said Dr. George Caughey, M.D., a researcher involved in the work. “Such research could improve our understanding of inflammation in bacterial infections, and help us to craft therapies for relief of inflammation and its consequences for short and long-term health,” he noted. To make this discovery, scientists studied the effect of two strains of pseudomonas bacteria on isolated mouse white blood cells tasked with killing bacteria, called neutrophils.

To make this discovery, scientists studied the effect of two strains of pseudomonas bacteria on isolated mouse white blood cells tasked with killing bacteria, called neutrophils. Results showed that one strain killed the neutrophils, but the second strain produced substances that caused the neutrophils to increase their production of histamine significantly. To see if their discovery was applicable outside of the test tube, the histamine-stimulating strain was then used to infect mice to produce bronchitis and pneumonia. These mice experienced a significant increase of histamine in their airways and lungs. Additional work showed that the bacteria persuade neutrophils to produce histamine by causing them to make much more of the key enzyme in histamine synthesis (histidine decarboxylase) than neutrophils would otherwise do in the unstimulated state.

“Despite advances in diagnosing and treating the symptoms of asthma and allergy, our understanding of the underlying initiating events remains elusive,” said John Wherry, Ph.D., Deputy Editor of the Journal of Leukocyte Biology. “This report helps shed light on how an ‘everyday organism’ might trigger asthma and allergy from an immune cell type not normally thought to be involved in allergic disease.”

About the Journal of Leukocyte Biology

The Journal of Leukocyte Biology (http://www.jleukbio.org) publishes peer-reviewed manuscripts on original investigations focusing on the cellular and molecular biology of leukocytes and on the origins, the developmental biology, biochemistry and functions of granulocytes, lymphocytes, mononuclear phagocytes and other cells involved in host defense and inflammation. The Journal of Leukocyte Biology is published by the Society for Leukocyte Biology.

About George Caughey, M.D.

Dr. Caughey received an M.D. from Stanford. After Medicine and Pulmonary subspecialty training at Pennsylvania Hospital and UCSF, he trained in lung research at UCSF’s Cardiovascular Research Institute and at Genentech, joining UCSF’s pulmonary faculty in 1986. He occupies the Julius and Lillian Nadel Endowed Chair and is Chief of the Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Section at the San Francisco VA Medical Center. Major activities include laboratory-based research, teaching, inpatient and outpatient clinical consulting, and serving on editorial, administrative, and advisory committees.

Research Interests
Extracellular proteases influence the pathology of lung diseases. The lab is interested in the roles of known and novel proteases in normal and diseased lung, emphasizing roles in scarring, ion transport, and anti-bacterial defense. The lab’s traditional focus is on peptidases secreted by mast cells, which are resident inflammatory cells especially abundant in human lung. The lab characterized several of the major secreted mast cell serine proteases. Achievements include the first cloning of a tryptase and discovery of new functions of these enzymes as peptidases, secretagogues and modulators of muscle tone. These investigations encouraged pharmaceutical development of tryptase inhibitors. The lab characterized the multi-gene human tryptase locus, discovering novel genes encoding membrane-anchored (gamma) and truncated (delta) tryptases, as well as major polymorphisms and population-skewed inheritance of deficiency alleles like alpha and frame-shifted beta. A current thrust of research concerns clinical consequences of human variations in inheritance of mast cell tryptase genes.

Asthma Affects 1 in 12 of the Population in the UK

A new study will shed light on late phase of asthma attacks

Press reports by the Imperial College London reflect that Asthma affects 1 in 12 of the population in the UK, with 5.4 million people currently receiving treatment. The UK has the highest prevalence of asthma in young adults in Europe and the numbers of children reporting asthma symptoms has risen six fold over the last 30.

A new grant from the Medical Research Council and GlaxoSmithKline will enable researchers to investigate mechanisms of potentially life-threatening asthma attacks. Research into acute asthma attacks boosted with £4m award

The grant, to the MRC-Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma at Imperial College London and King’s College London, will enable researchers to investigate how acute asthma attacks, which can be life-threatening and are often resistant to the few available treatments, are linked to allergy and viral infection. Professor Sebastian Johnston of Imperial College London and Dr Roberto Solari of GSK will lead three teams of scientists at Imperial, King’s and GSK to explore novel mechanisms of disease and identify potential targets for the development of new treatments.

Professor Johnston, Director of the MRC-Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma at Imperial, said: ”This is a wonderful opportunity to combine the unique clinical models we have developed at Imperial with truly cutting edge science at King’s and drug discovery expertise at GSK, into a new alliance to boost efforts to develop new therapies for this huge unmet medical need”

Professor Stephen Holgate, Chair of the MRC Population and Systems Medicine Board said: “The human immune system provides vital protection from a vast array of diseases, but in some cases – such as asthma and allergy – it can be our worst enemy. This important investment by the MRC and GSK will help to advance our understanding of how these conditions interact at a molecular level, which we hope will inform new, effective and targeted therapies that make a real difference to patients.”

Roberto Solari, from GlaxoSmithKline Respiratory Drug Discovery, said: “GSK has a strong heritage of over 40 years experience in respiratory research and medicines. This is an exciting partnership for GSK to be involved in, examining state of the art science and bringing together experts in the field of asthma research. Gaining further understanding of the role viral infections might have in the development of allergic asthma could offer potential to unlock science that will help to develop future treatments and improve the lives of patients.”

Dr Samantha Walker, Executive Director of Research and Policy at Asthma UK, said: “This programme of research will be vital in exploring potential new treatments for asthma, a condition that still kills over 1,000 people every year in the UK. Despite the fact that asthma affects around 5.4 million people, research into asthma is under-resourced and so this funding is a huge boost. We hope the programme will lead to the discovery of new, life-changing treatments, particularly for the thousands of people whose asthma is resistant to current medicines.”

The MRC-Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma was established in 2006 to unite two hubs of asthma research expertise at King’s and Imperial into a single, world-leading Centre.

Asthma High Cost and Air Pollution Link Says Study

Air pollution is taking a higher toll than previously thought, especially in Long Beach and Riverside, CA Says New Study

According to published reports, researchers at USC’s Keck School of Medicine and the University of Massachusetts released a study Tuesday afternoon. They found that asthma caused by air pollution from cars is costing Long Beach and Riverside a combined $18 million a year.

According to the report, researchers looked at risk factors that hadn’t been examined before: things like school absences, lost wages of a parent who stays home with a sick child, and the number of doctor visits.

The report says asthma care devours on average up to 8 percent of a household’s income in those communities, and that’s above the 5 percent that’s considered to be affordable.

The researchers chose Long Beach and Riverside because of their high pollution levels, and because of the many large roads within them that run close to neighborhoods.

Asthma and Radon Workshop to be held in Birmingham, AL

Asthma and Radon Workshop to be held in Birmingham, Alabama

ATLANTA – Representatives from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Alabama Radon Education Program – Alabama Cooperative Extension System will present a community workshop on asthma and radon on January 24, 2012.

The workshop will include discussions on asthma and asthma triggers, such as secondhand smoke, pets, air pollution, cockroaches, and chemicals used in the home. Attendees will also learn about radon (the second leading cause of lung cancer in the United States) and its current impact in the North Birmingham area. Participants will be given a radon detector and instructions on how to measure radon in their homes. The workshop is free and open to the public.

WHO: EPA, Jefferson County Department of Health, and the Alabama Radon Education Program – Alabama Cooperative Extension System

WHAT: Asthma and Radon Workshop

WHEN: January 24, 2012 from 6:00 p.m. until 8:00 p.m. CST (Doors will open at 5:30 p.m.)

WHERE: Jefferson County Committee for Economic Opportunity Head Start/Early Head Start Calloway Center
3417 34th Terrace North

Birmingham, AL

Release Date: 01/19/2012
Contact Information: Dawn Harris-Young, (404) 562-8421, harris-young.dawn@epa.gov

Asthma Risk and Children Born by C-Section Study

Published reports in the American Journal of Epidemiology reflect that children delivered by Cesarean section appear to be at a slight increased risk of developing asthma by age 3.

According to press reports, researchers analyzed data from more than 37,000 participants in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study in order to compare the health of children who were delivered by planned or emergency C-section with those who were born vaginally.

The results showed that children delivered by C-section had a slightly increased risk for asthma at age 3, but no increased risk for wheezing or frequent lower respiratory tract infections. The risk of asthma was highest among those whose mothers did not have allergies.

According to the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, “It is unlikely that a Cesarean delivery itself would cause an increased risk of asthma, rather that children delivered this way may have an underlying vulnerability,” study primary author Maria Magnus, a researcher at the department of chronic diseases.

Possible reasons for the increased risk of asthma among children delivered by C-section include an altered bacterial flora in their intestine that affects their immune system development, or the fact that these children are more likely to

While the study found an association between C-section birth and asthma, it did not demonstrate a cause and effect.

Asthma Study Offers Clues to Why Some Don’t Benefit From Asthma Meds

Press reports reflect that almost half of patients with mild or moderate asthma may have a different type of disease than those with more severe symptoms, perhaps explaining why common treatments don’t work well for them, new research suggests.

A large subgroup of mild-to-moderate asthma is persistently non-eosinophilic

A large percentage of patients with mild-to-moderate asthma have persistently non-eosinophilic disease which may not respond to currently available anti-inflammatory treatments, according to a new study.

In a cross-sectional study of 995 asthmatic subjects enrolled in nine clinical trials conducted by the NHLBI’s Asthma Clinical Research Network, sputum eosinophilia (?2% eosinophils) was found in only 36% of asthmatics not using an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and 17% of those using an ICS. Among patients who achieved good asthma control, 26% had sputum eosinophilia, compared with 15% among patients who had not achieved good control.

The findings were published online ahead of print publication in the American Thoracic Society’s American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.

Among asthmatic subjects not taking an ICS who had repeated induced sputum samples, 22% had sputum eosinophilia on every occasion (persistent eosinophilia), 31% had eosinophilia on at least one occasion (intermittent eosinophilia), and 47% had no eosinophilia on every occasion (persistently non-eosinophilic). Two weeks of treatment with a combination of anti-inflammatory drugs resulted in significant improvements in airflow obstruction in subjects with eosinophilic asthma, but not in those with persistently non- eosinophilic asthma. Bronchodilator responses to albuterol, however, were similar in eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic asthma.

“Prevalence estimates for non-eosinophilic asthma in earlier studies were based on single sputum samples,” said John Fahy, MD, MSc, professor of medicine and director of the Cardiovascular Research Institute/University of California San Francisco Airway Clinical Research Center. “Here we show for the first time that sputum eosinophilia is persistently absent in a large percentage of patients with mild/moderate asthma when sputum is analyzed repeatedly over time.”

The poor response to intense combined treatment seen in patients with persistently non-eosinophilic asthma suggests that these patients have a unique disease phenotype for which new treatments need to be developed. Treatment responses in patients with intermittent eosinophilia were similar to those of patients with persistent eosinophilia.

“A large subgroup of patients with mild-to-moderate asthma do not have the usual eosinophilic subtype that is responsive to steroid treatment,” concluded Dr. Fahy. “In addition to the implications for the care of these patients, our results have important implications for future asthma research. In clinical studies, the eosinophil phenotype of patients should be characterized to better understand treatment responses and disease mechanisms. In addition, appropriate in vitro and animal models for the study of the mechanisms of non-eosinophilic airway disease need to be developed.”

Asthma and Stem Cell Therapy

Stem Cell Therapy May Help Treat Patients with Severe Asthma Says Study

According to a study conducted by Dr Eva Mezey, of the National Institutes of Health in Maryland, mice that developed Asthma by being exposed to pollen were protected against attacks after the cells obtained from bone marrow were injected into them.

These particular stem cells are already used to suppress inflammatory response after bone marrow transplants in humans according to the report.

The researchers believe the bone marrow stem cells reduce inflammation in the airways, the immune system’s normal response to severe cases of asthma.

The researchers whose findings are published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences say about 5,000 people a year die from asthma in the US alone with 100,000 fatalities throughout the world.

Treatments for severe cases are largely inadequate at resolving the sufferer’s conditions so new ones are needed for therapy-resistant ones.

They say the stem cells are already used to treat autoimmune diseases and the same approach could provide help treat asthma and other severe allergic conditions.

Lead researcher Dr Mezey and colleagues said: “These data suggest that allergic conditions — specifically therapy resistant asthma — might also be a likely target of the recently discovered cellular therapy approach using BMSCs.

“These data provide another example of the ability of BMSCs to ‘sense’ their immunological environment and respond accordingly.

“It is hard to imagine a drug or combination of drugs that could act this way and further work should be done to determine whether the cells could be used to treat patients with therapy-resistant asthma.”

Asthma: Searching for a Cure; Are Antibiotics the Answer?

Asthma: Searching for a Cure;
Are Antibiotics the Answer?

By Tinka Davi

This is a story about one mans search for a cure for Asthma.

For more than seven years, Bill Cullifer of Folsom, CA has suffered from asthma. His conversation is punctuated by deep, uncontrollable coughs that occur frequently and without warning. His children can often locate him by his frequent coughs.

Asthma prevents him from strenuous physical activity. In fact, Cullifer’s energy is so regularly sapped, he finds it difficult to exercise at all.

First diagnosed with adult onset asthma in 2004 Cullifer sought treatment from his primary physician and has consulted with a variety of specialist ranging from allergist, ear nose and throat specialist and pulmonologist.

To treat his Asthma they’ve prescribed three different medications, Zymbicort, Sprivia and Prednisone,

Now Cullifer has added another med, an antibiotic, azithromycin to the mix. That medication is the result of his ceaseless pursuit of information about asthma, its causes, remedies and a possible cure.

To assist him in his research, Cullifer established an Asthma foundation, a news blog and a Facebook page to help him educate himself and others about Asthma and lung disease. It was there (https://worldasthmafoundation.org/asthma-and-chlamydia-pneumoniae.htm ) that he ran across a press release and a video presentation from the American Society of Microbiology annual conference that talked about the role of bacteria in severe asthma and the potential for antibiotic treatment. A study presented by Eduard Drizik, a microbiologist at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, showed a significant link between Chlamydia pneumoniae (bacteria that causes severe asthma symptoms, not the sexually transmitted disease) and the severity of asthma.

“We know that asthma is a multifactorial disease and has many phenotypes.” Phenotypes are observable properties of an organism that are produced by the interaction of the genotype and the environment.

“We have found infectious phenotypes and based on the data and findings that have shown that there is one phenotype that can be curable with antibiotics,” said Drizik.

The article stated that “. . . patients who were treated on the basis of asthma severity with antibiotics had significant improvements in asthma symptoms and some even experienced a complete abolition of these symptoms.” Drizik recommended that physicians should further explore the involvement of microbes in difficult to treat asthma cases, since there might be a cure for some types of asthma.

The word “cure” definitely caught Cullifer’s attention.

He dug further and found a physician in Wisconsin, David L. Hahn, who has pioneered the research and has published a paper on the treatment of C. pneumoniae. Hahn, a family practitioner and Dean of the Medical Center and Clinical Professor at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, began treating his asthma patients with antibiotics several years ago.
Cullifer called and interviewed Hahn. Their discussion is podcast on Facebook at http://facebook.com/asthmafoundation.

In the interview, Hahn said that the patients with new onset asthma who had documented C. pneumoniae infections and who received antibiotics improved. In fact, he said, their asthma disappeared after early treatment. However, those with longstanding persistent asthma didn’t respond well to traditional treatments and Hahn prescribed the antibiotic azithromycin.

Hahn said, “Azithromycin is unique . . . almost like a magic bullet for intracellular infections, because of all the macrolide antibiotics, which are effective against Chlamydia pneumoniae, it concentrates intracellularly and doesn’t get out of the cells very easily.” Because that’s where the bacteria live, that’s where the medicine should be.

Hahn credits Pfizer, Inc. developers of Zithromax (azithromycin) who showed an early interest in doing clinical trials on the effect of the drug and asthma. “They did help in very significant ways…but made a decision not to lodge major clinical trials in asthma,” Hahn said.

The doctor recommends long-term dosing of Zithromax/azithromycin, instead of the typical 10 days to two weeks of treatment. Cullifer is taking the medication for 14 weeks and is already feeling better. “I’m into my fourth week and I definitely have more energy,” he said.

There’s a downside to taking azithromycin long term. It’s what Hahn calls an antibiotic resistance on the part of physicians who have been trained not to prescribe antibiotics unnecessarily. Other physicians just don’t sign on to prescribing it, but Hahn and patients including Cullifer are hopeful that will change when the benefits are widely publicized and understood.

Hahn noted that many asthma patients who ask to be treated with azithromycin are being turned away because their physicians don’t know about the potential for treatment and it’s not in the guidelines. He’d like to see pressure on the part of the public to let physicians and practice know there is a real demand for this sort of treatment with antibiotics.

He’s writing a book that he hopes might broaden the public’s awareness of the issue. “This is creative gonzo marketing and may be the only way to go because I have tried all the traditional routes,” Hahn said.

Cullifer has had asthma episodes and been hospitalized more than once. “I could have died,” he said. That’s why he’s supporting physicians like Drizik and Hahn and their diligent efforts to find treatment for long term and severe asthma. Cullifer is continually providing resources and updates on the World Asthma Foundation blog and on Facebook. Like other asthma sufferers, he is campaigning for a cure.

About Asthma
The World Health Organization estimates that 235 million people suffer from asthma, a chronic disease characterized by recurrent attacks of breathlessness, coughing and wheezing. These attacks vary in severity and frequency from person to person. The disease is managed by controlling symptoms, which may occur several times in a day or week in affected individuals. For some people, symptoms become worse during physical activity or at night. Asthma is a strong risk factor for the development of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (COPD), one of the most chronic lung diseases that make it difficult to breathe. The recognition that asthma pathogenesis involves chronic inflammation has led to studies investigating the presence of various infectious organisms. There is no cure for asthma.

Tinka Davi, contributing writer and editor for the World Asthma Foundation, writes on a variety of health issues and lifestyle topics. She is based in Folsom, CA.

Asthma and Ozone

Does Ozone Matter?

According to Mount Sinai School of Medicine of New York, NY climate change may lead to more asthma-related health problems in children, resulting in more emergency room visits in the next decade.

Researchers found changing levels of ozone could lead to more than a seven percent increase in ER visits by children under 17.

The team used regional and atmospheric chemistry models to simulate ozone levels for June through August in the 2020s and compared them to 1990s levels.

Study authors say they plan to continue using these models to understand specific impacts of climate change. They conclude better measures to reduce carbon pollution need to be implemented to protect our health.

The abstract was presented on Sunday, May 3, 2009 at the Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting in Baltimore, Maryland. The lead author of this research is Perry Elizabeth Sheffield, MD, Pediatric Environmental Health Fellow in the Department of Community and Preventive Medicine and the Department of Pediatrics at Mount Sinai School of Medicine. Mount Sinai worked with Natural Resources Defense Council and the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health on this eye-opening research that finds a direct connection between air pollution and the health of children.Ozone has many known negative respiratory health effects to which children are particularly vulnerable.

An important projected consequence of climate change is the increase in ground-level ozone. Urban areas such as the New York City metropolitan area are at a higher risk of increasing temperature compared to rural areas. However, while more ozone is formed in higher temperatures, the downwind suburban areas are predicted in some of the models to experience higher ozone levels.

For this study, Dr. Sheffield and her colleagues created a model describing future projected rates of respiratory hospitalizations for children less than two years of age using baseline NYC metropolitan area hospitalization rates from publicly available corresponding state Department of Health databases.

These hospitalization rates were then compared to a previously developed dose-response relationship between ozone levels and pediatric respiratory hospitalizations, and the expected New York City eight-hour daily maximum ozone levels for the 2020s, as projected by a regional climate model created by the NY Climate and Health Project, supported by a grant from the US Environmental Protection Agency.

Two separate future scenarios were used. The two scenarios differed by the amount of projected ozone precursor emissions (chemicals that are converted to ozone by light and heat).

In both scenarios, ozone levels rise by 2020. The study found that by 2020, respiratory hospitalizations are projected to rise between four and seven percent for children under two years old because of projected air pollution (ozone) increases. The scenario with increased ozone precursors showed less of an overall increase in hospital admissions because of a paradoxical reduction in ozone due to the effects of air pollutant interactions, sometimes referred to as the scavenger molecule effect. These are likely conservative estimates because population was held constant, a single dose response function was used for the entire area, and most counties were not weighted by race and ethnicity. “These significant changes in children’s hospitalizations from respiratory illnesses would be a direct result of projected climate-change effects on ground-level ozone concentrations,” said Dr. Sheffield. “This research is important because it shows that we as a country need to implement policies that both improve air quality and also prevent climate change because this could improve health in the present and prevent worsening respiratory illness in the future.”

Our study supports the necessity of improving air pollution around the world. We need to begin to make these improvements through industry emission controls, traffic reduction policies, and increased enforcement of traffic regulations, said study co-author Dr. Philip Landrigan, Professor and Chair of Community and Preventive Medicine, and Director of the Children’s Environmental Health Center, at Mount Sinai School of Medicine.